Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking

Yup. What’s going to keep it from becoming standard procedure is the fact that entrenched pols will have to do the resigning. Of course, that can be undone also by merely running again in the next election. The LIVs have their backs.

What should happen, is have the recall anyway, and let the voters choose the replacement. But I’m betting the state won’t allow that, and will deem the recall ballot moot. This will establish a new underhanded Rat tactic, along with the fleebagging they’ve done from other states to prevent quorums from being formed.


14 posted on 11/28/2013 9:28:46 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty

And like I said, they could probably just resign two of them and appoint them to each other’s seats. What needs to happen is an initiative that makes it pointless, IOW, it’s not a recall drive but a special election drive. If you get enough signatures to force a new election for that particular seat, it will do them no good to rearrange the namecards. The election still takes place.


16 posted on 11/28/2013 9:46:32 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson