I did. He rails against Reaganomics.
If you don’t like being identified as a bigot, you might want to check the definition and be sure that your dislike of it is not over what is true. but not liking it alone does not make it untrue.
Who says I don't like it? You let your assumptions be known, which let me let my assumptions be known. I liked the opportunity to make that post. I think its a very dangerous thing to put that kind of trust in any man other than Jesus. Naturally as a Protestant, I follow no man other than Jesus word for word. I listen to teachers and preachers, some of which I agree with 99% of the time, but just because I think they're right 99% of the time doesn't mean I'll contort myself to go over the cliff on that last 1%. That last 1% can cost your soul dearly. I listen to teachers and preachers for direction, then see if they are in agreement with scripture.
What you said about me, such as taking everything this man says as more important and more infallible than what Jess says,...
I never said that. I said that no man has a direct source to perfect wisdom.
...illustrates that you, in your prejudice, are willing to generalize about Catholics, about which you really know little, and attribute those misconceptions onto me. and having a mob with you, in agreement, you attack me.
What mob? Just me and you over the last several posts.
Just because you and your people say that Catholics do not base their beliefs on the Bible, doesn’t make it true. The Mass is from the Bible, as are the Sacraments, as are all the readings we witness at Mass every day.
I never said that either.
You should read what you wrote. None of it is true. Every sentence is untrue.
Get away from me.
“That’s the problem with claiming any man besides Jesus having a direct source of perfect wisdom. Whether a politician or a religious figure, they will ultimately let you down because only Jesus was perfect in wisdom in the flesh. Because you claim that a certain man should lead without question, now you must contort yourself when he shows himself to not be infallible, and you even have to go against long established conservative standards such as supply side economics in order to cling to the believe that this man should lead the world spiritually.”