“But the equal treatment of gay couples is more important than the free speech rights of commercial photographers, she said, explaining why the A.C.L.U. filed a brief in the New Mexico Supreme Court supporting the couple.”
That’s not what the Constitution says. It says “No Law” shall abridge the right of free speech. As Justice black said many years ago: “No law means no law.”
Using this logic should they be forced to photograph pornography between consenting adults?