Have to disagree about that one. It's like showing pictures of Americans jumping off the top of the World Trade Center because muslim terrorists flew airplanes into buildings to kill Americans, or
asking liberals why they consider "tea-bagging" an insult. If the details are not brought out, the libs think they are being cute and getting away with something. They need to be reminded that when they infer that Tea Party members are homosexuals engaging in homosexual activities, they are either insulting the TEA people or the homosexuals.
No more free rides; no more free lunches. You have to make the hate-speechers explain why they say what they say.
So much for making italics work properly.
when they imply...
Your second and third paragraphs disagree with each other.
In the 2nd, you disagree that the details should be gone into, and compare it to photos of Americans jumping out of the Twin Towers on 9/11....
In the 3rd, you state the details should be said... Like what Tea bagger REALLY means.
Which one is correct then, or am I missing something?
I can't see Britt Hume bringing out details like that. He's above all that. Obviously, Wall ass is not.
I guarantee you if it were Hillary of the fat mooch there would have been no details by wall ass--he's a typical chickenshi__ wannabe excuse for a urinalist.