Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Announces That It Is Going To Stop Stockpiling U.S. Dollars
DC Clothesline ^ | 11/22/2013 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 11/23/2013 7:25:46 AM PST by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: DannyTN

You have to understand that Free Trade is a religion taught in EVERY business school in the country.


101 posted on 11/23/2013 11:46:38 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The Chinese have sold off a small amount of US debt over the last two years. They are down from their peak holdings....Yes this is known but now they are trumpeting it I guess


102 posted on 11/23/2013 11:47:37 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
So I’d estimate a 10% tariff results in a 1.0% increase in the general price level. But to put 23% of Americans back to work, and restore American industry, that seems a reasonable price to pay.

Doesn't sound very suicidal to me.

103 posted on 11/23/2013 11:47:53 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I blame the unions because of the extremely fat cats at the head of each. With each humongous rise in wages and benefits inflation rose to meet those raises.

I also blame the CEO imbeciles who treated the unions as children and caved in each and every time to the demands.

A great example of this was the UAW and GM at the time that the communist Walter Reuther was killed in a plane crash on his way to the UAW resort in Michigan. Leonard Woodcock became his replacement. The auto contract was up for negotiations in order to renew. GM execs decided that since they’d have to deal with Woodcock they needed to make him look good, so they caved very quickly and granted everything.

So, you see both sides are to blame, but the big problem now is how to roll these excesses back.


104 posted on 11/23/2013 11:48:19 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
I blame the unions because of the extremely fat cats at the head of each.

You are not paying attention: unions workers account for only 10% of the manufacturing workforce. You are fighting the last war...

105 posted on 11/23/2013 11:50:50 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Yeah, the real question is why they chose to trumpet/make official what they were already doing for sometime.

imho because of sharply rising oil production — & slowly falling US demand for oil—the pressure is on the dollar to rise. The QE’s are supplying downward pressure on the dollar—which keeps the dollar relatively stable —but whenever the QE’s come off — the dollar will rise sharply.

That means the value of China’s dollar reserves rises.


106 posted on 11/23/2013 11:54:50 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

How can it be? Obama is on track to increase the federal debt by 87% by 2016...


107 posted on 11/23/2013 11:56:15 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Obama is on track to increase the federal debt by 87% by 2016....

..........
well yes , since the beginning of his term.

debt for fy2013 at 680 billion was still astronomical by historical standards. But the decline in the deficit from the year before was also astronomical by historical standards.

Just as stock market prices are valuations of future earnings — so also is the value of the dollar a valuation of the future economy—and the future of federal tax receipts — of the USA.

Both are looking very rosy.

You just can’t underestimate how profoundly significant for the USA the oil and gas fracking revolution is.(Hint, the USA has been steadily defunded since the 1970’s. We are in the very first years of a major major decades long turn around)


108 posted on 11/23/2013 12:04:49 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The Chinese essentially quit lending the US money several years ago; if anything, they’re lending us maybe $100 billion per year.

Regarding the Federal deficit - the national debt a month ago (after the latest budgetary can-kick) was $900 billion higher than it was the same date a year earlier.

Lastly, the last time the Federal government balanced its budget (on a fiscal-year basis) was during the Eisenhower administration. It nearly balanced one time in the late 1990’s, but has run a deficit EVERY SINGLE YEAR since about 1957.


109 posted on 11/23/2013 12:13:15 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
On the bright side, we invented modern capitalism. The Chinese are attempting to do a knockoff of it while functioning under a command economy. They'll fail in the long run... total lack of creativity. But in the short run they'll score - big time.
110 posted on 11/23/2013 12:20:10 PM PST by GOPJ ("Knockout game' - newest reason NO OTHER RACIAL group wants to live near blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Thanks. That explanation answered a lot of the questions I had.

How long can it go on? If as much money goes into the stock market as goes out (a simplification I know) the feds collect the capital gains taxes and the stock market stays stable. It seems that interest rates on savings would have to stay near zero to keep that balance, so the feds have to keep printing money.

Can this be a new normal which can be stabilized?

111 posted on 11/23/2013 12:26:52 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

You forgot the part where all the other countries put tariffs on anything we export, like food, chemicals, natural gas, heavy equipment etc etc...


112 posted on 11/23/2013 12:32:05 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

You seem to think American would lose in such a face-off.

America imports a massive amount of production, that other countries make.

Not the other way around.

We have given and sold American manufacturing out from under our very own selves.

America makes virtually nothing now.

Bring back American jobs. If it takes a trade war to get things balanced back out again.

I say let’s start. Now.


113 posted on 11/23/2013 12:36:39 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
that's cause they are waiting for it to bite them in the azz...
114 posted on 11/23/2013 12:53:34 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Because trade wars never lead to real wars right?


115 posted on 11/23/2013 1:07:12 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Well we’re being railroaded right now.

What exists now, will lead to a real war.

We do not stand up for American industry. Ever.


116 posted on 11/23/2013 1:09:52 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

A trade war is a real war. And we are not fighting.


117 posted on 11/23/2013 1:15:53 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Probably so. Lolly gagging along in ‘I wonder’ mode.


118 posted on 11/23/2013 1:50:53 PM PST by B4Ranch (Name the illness that you have and Google it with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Sure we need defense. Don’t get me wrong, we need to protect and grow defense.

All of the Dubai Airshow orders were for civilian airliners and the engines for them.

We have a large number of jobs available in this country right now.

What we don't have is a workforce trained and willing to do them.

We have idiot "guidance counselors" pushing kids into worthless four year degrees along with parents doing the same thing.

A two year degree in a technical college can get one far further ahead in many cases.

119 posted on 11/23/2013 2:05:39 PM PST by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I partially agree with you. Just look at what Obama has “accomplished” in the last two years (leaving aside his record prior to that). It wipes away any advantage most U.S. manufacturers would gain from an across the board 10% tariff.

My own experience in manufacturing is that ON AVERAGE you’d need 50 to 100% tariffs to truly level the playing field. I know some will say that can’t be, but if you take a truly honest look at what it would take to build an “All American” car from the minerals & such up to a finished product, even assuming the components manufacturers were in place in the US and running large volumes, well, that’s how it works out.

Another consideration is that to obtain the production efficiencies needed to even have a chance at competing, you have to highly automate, which means you don’t generate many jobs. Indeed there is much discussion of this conundrum, including here on FR. I’ll be the first to agree that we need to bring a lot of manufacturing back to the US, even if some here, like CNN, would disagree with me on how to accomplish that. The problem for employment is that the net result is few jobs added.

Also one must keep in mind that in many cases the most effective foreign manufacturers are themselves highly automated, in some cases with equipment and facilities that are jaw dropping. If you doubt this, go visit a major cold forged parts plant. The US has NEVER had plants anything like those, to produce such parts.

The real problem with tariffs, though, is that they are essentially a hidden tax.


120 posted on 11/23/2013 3:05:00 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson