Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Third World-ism isn't just Obama's culture/race, it is his upbringing...communist and socialist fathers and mother. Harry Reid has no excuse except he is a crook and Pelosi is paddling the air on her way to total insanity. America has been bamboozled and defeated by the Politically Correct and the Socialist/Communist...
1 posted on 11/22/2013 10:36:17 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: yoe

Third Reich comes to mind.


2 posted on 11/22/2013 10:37:22 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Caddell further cementing his position as the Last Sane Democrat.


4 posted on 11/22/2013 10:40:59 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

I don’t get the qualifier ‘semi-political’.


5 posted on 11/22/2013 10:41:43 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
To all Democrats:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty also: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson

Remember that bold statement as representing the underlying, and essential, principle of America's Declaration of Independence!

Then, as you think about John F. Kennedy today, remember these words from him:

“The same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe, the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.” - (John F. Kennedy - 1961 Inaugural)

Pat, when, and how, did your Party's leadership wander so far away from that essential, underlying principle of liberty?

6 posted on 11/22/2013 10:41:48 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Patrick Caddell. The last principled democrat on earth?


7 posted on 11/22/2013 10:43:19 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Pat Caddell has almost made up for giving us Carter.

The truth of the matter is the legislative branch is now irrelevant. That fundamental change obama promised has arrived. I still can’t understand how he has so many people on his side. Even if it’s NSA blackkmail it would mean thousands of people helping him. It has to be evil plain and simple.


8 posted on 11/22/2013 10:43:34 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Time for a Con Con.

The Rat idiots have no boundaries on either their tyranny or their will to control.

They will abide by nothing less than that legal remedy, and they may even disregard that, leaving only one option.

9 posted on 11/22/2013 10:43:51 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Let me remind you that we here on FR have know this for a LONG TIME.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2173300/posts

See Post #23:

“Welcome to New Kenya”

“Where the law of the jungle has replace the Law of the Land”

23 posted on Wed 28 Jan 2009 06:42:31 AM CST by Texas Fossil


10 posted on 11/22/2013 10:45:09 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
"America has been bamboozled and defeated by the Politically Correct, the insane, and the Socialist/Communist...

Agree with a small addition to your listing of characteristics redundant as it may seem.

11 posted on 11/22/2013 10:45:54 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

I am trying hard to find where the founds required 60 votes. I really am. We wanted the Republicans to do this when they had the Senate and were pissed off when McCain caused the Republicans to chicken out.


12 posted on 11/22/2013 10:50:12 AM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Yes, we can be a Marxist tyranny!


13 posted on 11/22/2013 10:50:31 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

WE HAVE PASSED THE POINT. WE ARE A COMMUNISTS RULED NATION.


14 posted on 11/22/2013 10:50:39 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
RE :”The rule of law has been replaced in Washington by “yes we can.” The events we witnessed Thursday in the Senate, that is Majority Leader Harry Reid's success at invoking the so-called ‘nuclear option,’ stripping the minority party of its primary power to block nominations, have become a stunning capstone to what has been already a steady erosion of a government of laws down to a sort of semi-political banana republic.”

Come on Pat, there is no law that says the Senate must honor a filibuster. Its a tradition not law.
Each house makes it own rules, controlled by majority.

Power grab yes, illegal no

15 posted on 11/22/2013 10:51:42 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Harry Reid's heavy-handed and anti-Constitutional action yesterday bears close scrutiny by all, Democrats, Republicans and all, who treasure individual liberty for themselves and future generations.

America's Constitution set the rules and limits for such power-thirsty individuals who might combine with others of their stripe to undermine "the People's" Constitution.

Below are the words of James Madison:

"Of the Declaration of Rights by the Assembly of France, Madison said:

"While the Declaration of Rights was before the National Assembly some of its members remarked that if a declaration of rights were published it should be accompanied by a Declaration of Duties. The observation discovered a mind that reflected, and it only erred by not reflecting far enough. A Declaration of Rights is, by reciprocity, a Declaration of Duties also. Whatever is my right as a man is also the right of another; and it becomes my duty to guarantee as well as to possess.

"The three first articles are the base of Liberty, as well individual as national; nor can any country be called free whose government does not take its beginning from the principles they contain, and continue to preserve them pure; and the whole of the Declaration of Rights is of more value to the world, and will do more good, than all the laws and statutes that have yet been promulgated.

"As it was impossible to separate the military events which took place in America from the principles of the American Revolution, the publication of those events in France necessarily connected themselves with the principles which produced them. Many of the facts were in themselves principles; such as the declaration of American Independence,

"However true, therefore, it may be, that the judicial department, is, in all questions submitted to it by the forms of the Constitution, to decide in the last resort, this resort must necessarily be deemed the last in relation to the authorities of the other departments of the government; not in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact, from which the judicial as well as the other departments hold their delegated trusts. On any other hypothesis, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of this department with the others in usurped powers, might subvert for ever, and beyond the possible reach of any rightful remedy, the very Constitution which all were instituted to preserve.

"The truth declared in the resolution being established, the expediency of making the declaration at the present day, may safely be left to the temperate consideration and candid judgment of the American public. It will be remembered that a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles, is solemnly enjoined by most of the state constitutions, and particularly by our own, as a necessary safeguard against the danger of degeneracy to which republics are liable, as well as other governments, though in a less degree than others. And a fair comparison of the political doctrines not unfrequent at the present day, with those which characterized the epoch of our revolution, and which form the basis of our republican constitutions, will best determine whether the declaratory recurrence here made to those principles, ought to be viewed as unseasonable and improper, or as a vigilant discharge of an important duty. The authority of constitutions over governments, and of the sovereignty of the people over constitutions, are truths which are at all times necessary to be kept in mind; and at no time perhaps more necessary than at the present."

- James Madison
17 posted on 11/22/2013 10:52:37 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

So our nation has been hanging by a thread for 200 years by “a rule”?


18 posted on 11/22/2013 10:54:05 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Republicans wont bring everything to a halt because as guilty as Democrats are of bullying whoever is in their path to get their way, Republicans are just as guilty of putting themselves first, before the people. Their damaging tactics are different but not less damaging.

They only care about political posturing. They think the nuclear option will only enhance their chances in 2014 therefore they just stand back and watch saying “Look what a bully Reid/Obama is”. To hell with the fact that the Democrats are taking over more of America with each move, Republicans are as guilty of putting their power over the people as Democrats.


22 posted on 11/22/2013 10:59:17 AM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

29 posted on 11/22/2013 11:17:15 AM PST by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

30 posted on 11/22/2013 11:17:33 AM PST by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

31 posted on 11/22/2013 11:17:48 AM PST by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

32 posted on 11/22/2013 11:18:04 AM PST by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson