Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rbmillerjr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II

Son, we are going to be crushed. Even Canada finds the F-35 unpalatable. We had better have one hell of a backup, and a full flock of pilots ready to go. We are going to lose every dogfight situation.

74 posted on 11/20/2013 6:11:17 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr

The plan is to have ten times more Lightnings than Raptors. Somebody seems to think 187 Raptors are enough or air dominance and then the Lightning has clear path for attack role.

That seems like cutting the quantity dangerously close to me.

Seems to me we should have 350-400 Raptors just in case. From what I’ve read Raptors enjoy a 280 to 1 kill ratio over enemy aircraft...which basically means it always wins, excepting human error.

I don’t like that quality/quantity mix....unless they believe we have something that is near ready, that is better.

The whole Raptor Lightning saga is really interesting, but air dominance is too critical to really enjoy the saga.


76 posted on 11/20/2013 6:24:45 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson