Thanks for the info.!
I disagree about the N/A, however: It is crucial that this information get out, with explanations like Kennedy’s, to a wider audience. Kennedy and the other witnesses are publicly known experts who carry some actual weight with the public, as opposed to anonymous posters on a conservative forum (which would include me if the subject was in MY areas of expertise.) :-)
That’s not at all to devalue your input! On the contrary, I find it essential to learn as much as I can absorb. However, with regard to Greta, I’m talking about information getting out to and being believed by more of the “general public”. She asks good questions, IMO.
Yes, everyone need to know so they can protect themselves.
As far as when to expect the site to be secure, FIRST they need to want it to be. Obviously, they don’t care all that much or the site wouldn’t have been up in the first place to allow people’s information to be compromised. (By ‘they’ I mean the administration and the company doing the work and anyone else involved. They all knew and long ago).