Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girlfriend says Zimmerman pointed shotgun at her
Yahoo News (AP) ^ | 11/18/2013 | MIKE SCHNEIDER

Posted on 11/18/2013 6:54:23 PM PST by South40

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: Conscience of a Conservative
I'm just saying that automatically saying "there's no there, there" is premature.

Well without third party confirmation there is no there there.

Is there a third party or evidence of any sort to back her up.

Frankly if someone pointed a gun at me you wouldn't have to push me out of the house and barricade the door so that I can't come in. I would be 5 blocks away within seconds -- not in the same room with him.

121 posted on 11/19/2013 6:58:38 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

So, any domestic incident, short of physical violence that leaves a mark, cannot be criminal?


No, but if the only evidence is the “victim’s” accusation, there is no case.


122 posted on 11/19/2013 6:58:49 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

My mother called 911, not once, but two separate times because her husband was threatening to kill her. The police told her there was nothing that they could do despite the marks on her neck, a black eye, and a bloody nose. They said that it was a he said, she said.


123 posted on 11/19/2013 6:59:32 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Other considerations can come into play, even in a “he said, she said” scenario - things like the relative credibility of the accuser/accused’s stories, history of similar conduct, etc. Not saying that stuff would resolve this case (we don’t know enough to say), just that your approach would effectively de-criminalize large amounts of criminal behavior.


Here is the problem with that: You can use someones history of similar conduct to make false claims that a weak minded jury would believe. And credibility is not an issue if there is only one eyewitness. It is a biblical principle. One witness is, effectively, no witness, as far as a court of law is concerned.

To be clear, other evidence becomes the equivalent of other witnesses, e.g. a video recording or evidence that disproves the claims of the accused and proves the claims of the acuser.

If all you have is your word against another person and you are the acuser, you have no case. And in this case, the broken table doesn’t help much. Glass tables are easy to break with the right hard object. Just drop a skillet on one.


124 posted on 11/19/2013 7:02:43 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

You’re right. She probably gently carried his stuff outside and carefully placed in on the lawn. Probably gingerly put bubble wrap around it so it wouldn’t get damaged. Yep, that must have been how it went because that’s how all these pack-your-shiite-up-and-get-outta-my-house situations work.


125 posted on 11/19/2013 7:04:27 AM PST by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

GZ said she was pg. The cops say she isn’t.


126 posted on 11/19/2013 7:05:13 AM PST by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

So what would be enough evidence to corroborate her story?


127 posted on 11/19/2013 7:14:02 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Out of curiosity, how long ago was this?


128 posted on 11/19/2013 7:15:13 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

So what would be enough evidence to corroborate her story?


Physical evidence regarding the gun that indicates it was pointed at her - or another eyewitness.

There are all sorts of mean things you can do to another person when it’s just the two of you that, should the other person pursue legal action, would have no chance whatsoever in a court of law. Civil court is another matter. They can be all over the map, and often are.


129 posted on 11/19/2013 7:22:20 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

What kind of physical evidence would indicate that a gun was pointed at her?

Also, regarding the table: She said he smashed the table. The table was smashed. It’s too early to say whether that’s enough (as you note, he may have some other explanation of how the table was broken), but the broken table would tend to corroborate her statement. Are you saying that accusactions of breaking someone’s things are only actionable if those things are hard to break?


130 posted on 11/19/2013 7:27:01 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

What kind of physical evidence would indicate that a gun was pointed at her?


You are getting to why it is a lame claim, even if true. However, if there was a hole in the wall from the gun being actually fired in the home, I’d consider that to be reason to believe the claim just may be true.

Sans that it is a hollow accusation and not really relevant.


131 posted on 11/19/2013 7:52:52 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

It was in the 90s in New Jersey.


132 posted on 11/19/2013 8:09:45 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
What kind of physical evidence would indicate that a gun was pointed at her?

If a guy pointed a gun at you, would you stand there in the same room with him arguing about broken sun glasses???

If he then pushed you out of the house with the gun in hand, would you stand outside the door and argue to be left back in???

If you called 911 during this time would your first words be that he broke my table and sun glasses or that he has me at gunpoint???

133 posted on 11/19/2013 9:21:37 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: bgill
What property did she damage? All I heard about was him breaking her furniture.

Also he claimed their argument was partly about her pregnancy and wanting to raise their child alone and it turns out she's not pregnant

134 posted on 11/19/2013 10:16:21 AM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

If it is still online here is GZ 911 call to the police...

George Zimmerman's 911 Call as the police arrived and came in


135 posted on 11/19/2013 10:26:20 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
I'm amazed at how people are willing to condone continued stupidity on George Zimmerman's part, simply because he was found not guilty in a self defense case. Mr Zimmerman has had THREE different women in his life, ALL who have fought with him and had domestic violence charges against him and filed restraining orders against him. Forget about Trayvon Martin, and let's say these women were all bimbos. He chose them. Is this the kind of man you would want around you? He's a damn hot head and a fool.
136 posted on 11/20/2013 7:30:22 AM PST by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger than yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Good points. However, I am over George Zimmerman, there is just something not quite right with him. It’s that “where there is smoke thingy.”


137 posted on 11/20/2013 7:40:44 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

“there is just something not quite right with him.”

He was put through hell and has no prospect of supporting himself or a decent relationship. And still has the POTUS on his a$$.

Not to mention a bunch of ‘would be gangstas’ out to make a name for themselves.


138 posted on 11/20/2013 7:47:45 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Considering the near universal criticism here of his behavior I’m amazed that you’re amazed that his behavior is condoned LOL!

Perhaps you’re confusing morality and legality.


139 posted on 11/20/2013 7:58:48 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Among George’s problems is that he falls for bad actresses like this one.

Among the police’s problem is that they fall for bad actresses like this one in domestic abuse claims.

Among the media’s problem is that they promote bad acting from bad actresses like this one.

Don’t fall into the same trap.


140 posted on 11/20/2013 8:07:02 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson