Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Lucky
Ah, but it says this:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.
And the ACA is binding upon the states, therefore the States must be a party. (And in this case, so are the federal government, and the peoples of the states as well.)
23 posted on 11/21/2013 11:32:26 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Except no state was a party, either as plaintiff or defendant, in the action the Court declined to hear.


25 posted on 11/21/2013 11:47:04 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson