Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer

Production cost do not include exploration cost, ie, reserve replacement cost.


10 posted on 11/17/2013 6:20:36 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Production cost do not include exploration cost, ie, reserve replacement cost.
...........
Yeah, you’ve mentioned that before. But technology is such a huge wild card. Consider the statement that they’re only getting 20% of the oil “in place” with current technology.

I find that shocking. I thought they were getting 40% of the oil in place. 20% leaves a whole lot of room for growth 10-20 years from now when technology improves with no exploration or reserve replacement costs.

Something I don’t understand but maybe you can explain. The article says

“According to an engineering manager at oil field services giant Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE: SLB) told Platts that U.S. shale production is only going to go up. His reasons: the vast size of the resource and growing familiarity with it. He also said that there’s plenty of room to improve extraction techniques and minimize the pushback from environmental groups. In the Eagle Ford shale play, for example, Schlumberger now uses well log data to determine the first five wells to drill in a new area. The technique has improved production by 33%. “

Do you consider well log data to be a facet of drilling costs or exploration costs.


15 posted on 11/17/2013 6:30:28 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson