You wrongly supposed that I didn't read the article before posting.
I never claimed to be the moral leader of conservative thought. I wasn't posting out of emotion, or judgement of you - and even posted that I WASN'T attacking (ie judging you).
I was trying to have a rational adult conversation with you and stated my opinion that glossing over facts and blaming the Amish doesn't help anything as in my opinion is tacit approval, whether intended or unintended.
Where I will be judgmental is this - it is apparently too much to discuss anything of substance and easier to blame the Amish or attack another poster of being a 'self appointed moral judge' vice a back-and-forth regarding the actual issues of media bias, hiding the identity of violent criminals, infringement of gun ownership, and the racist targeting of white and/or Christian America.
It is apparently too much to discuss why it is easier for even conservatives to identify perpetrators of violent crime. As I even stated my post was directed TO you (as in for discussion) and not AT you (as in an emotional or judgmental attack).
I understand you were kidding about and making a joke - I don't fault you for that. My posts were more of a question to you as to WHY the meme seemed to have more traction than statement of fact, or supposition based on trends and I expressed my frustration with such...... I really did want your opinion on that topic.
Repeat as in repetitious is a great first name for your Freeper Name. I understood your point the first time and it is boring and self righteous. So it is not worth repeating. I will not read it again. I like your style example “Not saying you’re (fill in the blank) I’m saying you act (fill in the blank). If I want to have an adult conversation, I’ll find an adult to converse with.