Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshinner_09

Save your outrage for the 45 year old “teachers” preying on 14 year old boys in our schools.

I am not excusing Clems actions, but I guarantee this was mutual.

High school girls have always dated college guys.


3 posted on 11/16/2013 6:12:29 AM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mylife

If it was consensual, she sure doesn’t act like it. She’s pretty outraged. And you see no problem with a man even coercing a 14 y/o girl into having sex? Really?


9 posted on 11/16/2013 6:25:21 AM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mylife
I am not excusing Clems actions, but I guarantee this was mutual.

Even if she came on to him, at 14, she was not legally able to give consent. He was the adult and should have thwarted any advances, even up to notifying family members that she was coming on to him.

10 posted on 11/16/2013 6:25:48 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

And the law is very clear a 14 year old cannot give consent.

Of course people are outraged at teachers abusing children. That is such a straw man and so not on point. your sense of outrage seems to be very very selective. Plus your ‘knowledge’ of high school girls is stereotypical and mostly untrue


17 posted on 11/16/2013 6:30:29 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mylife
such pathetic BS.......typical behavior of some like you...blame the victim first!..

I guarentee you're pretty much a jerk.....

32 posted on 11/16/2013 6:53:20 AM PST by cherry (.in the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

I expect there is more to this than we will ever know.

Anyone notice how the article stated ages?

Nowhere does it point out his age (19) at the time of the first episode when she was 14. It says, he *is* 25 and she *was* 14. The average numbnuts reader can’t do the math and sees 25 yo rapes 14 yo. This wording is not accidental, nor is it insignificant.

By deliberately making the age difference appear greater, the paper is doing a disservice to the truth (whatever it is in this case).

I’m not minimizing the potential offense here, but this piece is a sketchy and poorly written tabloid story. It refers to him in bold type as “the pervert”. With what little we know here, “pervert” is pushing it.

Note that a big deal is made about the safety of his 3 female children. Curiously, none of their ages are mentioned. Now there is a real leap. Idiot 19 yo male boinks 14 yo girl (whom we know nothing about at that time) and this magically translates into a 25 yo man wanting to sexually assault his own daughters who are probably under the age of 5?


34 posted on 11/16/2013 6:57:42 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson