Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer

Of course it didn’t. Many cars were destroyed who were in good condition and could have been sold to people who couldn’t afford a brand new car


11 posted on 11/14/2013 7:27:23 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin; Springfield Reformer
Of course it didn’t. Many cars were destroyed who were in good condition and could have been sold to people who couldn’t afford a brand new car

And someone with a car of their own isn't utterly dependent on public transportation.

That is unacceptable to a statist.

14 posted on 11/14/2013 9:07:40 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Many cars were destroyed who were in good condition and could have been sold to people who couldn’t afford a brand new car

The program was designed to target for destruction cars which were in good condition, since it only accepted cars which had been owned for a year or more by someone who was buying a new car. People who are able to afford a new car are far less likely than the population at large to keep a car which is isn't in good shape.

18 posted on 11/14/2013 3:42:11 PM PST by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson