Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dontreadthis

So now does the Supreme Court have to argue against itself that it is not a tax after all?


8 posted on 11/12/2013 7:33:27 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ToastedHead
So now does the Supreme Court have to argue against itself that it is not a tax after all?

The court, as an institution, didn't sign onto Justice Roberts' bizarre interpretation. It constitutes only an "advisory opinion" as to why he voted as he did.

No other justice concurred. Ergo, there is no existing ruling that the penalty is a tax.

9 posted on 11/12/2013 7:48:26 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson