Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert

It is a mathematical impossibility that we have SO many close election that are decided by a margin a of a handful votes.

The sample size here was over 2 million votes.

For a result this close,while the other races had larger margins either way, is prima facie evidence of fraud.

I have seen way too mnay instances of this happening since the CLinton years.

The Dems FIGHT for EVERY race, while the GOP-E shrugs their shoulders and say—”we’ll get them next time”.

Sorry, the Dems mean for there NOT to be a next time, and we better start fighting tooth and nail for every race.

They want the AG office here to inoculate Terry the Thief.

Just like Holder does for Obama.


4 posted on 11/12/2013 6:12:43 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exit82

In this case, letting the Democrat win would put 3 Democrats “in charge”. That leaves the Democrats with no one to blame when things go badly, and they will with McAuliffe. He’s a dirtbag and everyone knows it. Even the Democrat-controlled Roanoke Times refused to endorse him.
It would be nice for the Dems to be able to blame the “ReThuglican” AG for picking on McAuliffe when the inevitable happens. I suspect the Dems will win the office but regret it later.
This whole election was rigged and rife with voter fraud. People are starting to notice.


8 posted on 11/12/2013 6:17:27 AM PST by AppyPappy (Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: exit82

It’s easy to do, and the RATS have it figured out.

Step #1...Don’t turn in the liberal districts vote counts until all the other districts are turned in.

Step #2...Create the votes needed to win.

Step #3... Depend on the fact that Republicans won’t change things to put an end to it.


16 posted on 11/12/2013 6:25:31 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: exit82

"The Dems FIGHT for EVERY race, while the GOP-E shrugs their shoulders and say—”we’ll get them next time”.

It's more than just GOP-e members shrugging their shoulders- I think they often deliberately refuse to help Conservatives in need. They view Conservatives (especially the more outspoken and politically aggressive ones) as mere "embarrassments".

Most GOP-e members are inarticulate, hyper-sensitive people who feel they need all of the stars and planets to be aligned in order for Republicans to have any chance of winning anywhere, and those eeevil Conservatives "disrupt" those chances- so they are not worth defending.

19 posted on 11/12/2013 6:30:44 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: exit82
For a result this close,while the other races had larger margins either way, is prima facie evidence of fraud.

You'd better believe it. There MUST be double-blind vote counting for any level of integrity to be practiced in elections anymore. That means that NO precinct results will be released early - ALL voting districts transmit their results SIMULTANEOUSLY. Otherwise, the Dems know just how many "votes" to manufacture to bring it to this close of a count.

22 posted on 11/12/2013 6:44:40 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: exit82
It is a mathematical impossibility that we have SO many close election that are decided by a margin a of a handful votes.

That's what I've been thinking as well. First couple of times it happened I thought the rats just pulled it out but over and over again?

24 posted on 11/12/2013 6:50:07 AM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: exit82
It is a mathematical impossibility that we have SO many close election that are decided by a margin a of a handful votes.

How many elections have been decided by a handful of votes, out of the many thousands and thousands of elections that have been held? There's nothing impossible about it. In this particular case, the results pretty much mirror the pre-election polling.
30 posted on 11/12/2013 7:47:08 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson