HHS Mandate Loses Again, Obama Admin Can’t Force Family Business to Comply

Life News ^ | Steven Ertelt

[Morgana]

The HHS mandate that is a part of Obamacare was dealt another blow on Friday, as a federal appeals court ruled the Obama administration cannot force a family-run business in Illinois to comply with it and pay for birth control or abortion-causing drugs for its employees.

This ruling comes after another victory against the mandate earlier this month.

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a pro-life legal organization, informed LifeNews today that a decision by a federal appeals court that clears the way for the ObamaCare HHS Mandate to be put on hold represents a “significant victory for protecting the religious beliefs of individuals and corporations.”

In a 2-1 decision issued Friday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court reversed the federal district court’s denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction and remanded the case for the district court to enter the preliminary injunction. The appeals court upheld the rights of both individuals and companies to challenge the ObamaCare HHS Mandate – the first decision of its kind in the ongoing HHS Mandate litigation.

“This is a significant victory for protecting the religious beliefs of individuals and corporations,” said Edward White, Senior Counsel of the ACLJ who represents the Illinois company.

White told LifeNews: “It is also important to note that the appeals court determined that the HHS Mandate should not move forward against our clients while this issue is being litigated. It has been our position from the beginning that the HHS Mandate violates America’s longstanding history of protecting conscience rights. The Mandate is unlawfully compelling employers such as our clients to do the following: abandon their faith to comply with the law, or follow their faith and pay significant annual penalties to the federal government. The decision by the appeals court is encouraging as this issue heads to the Supreme Court.”

The ACLJ represents Korte & Luitjohan Contractors, Inc., a family owned, full-service construction contractor serving Central and Southern Illinois for over 50 years. The company is located in Highland, Illinois and has about 90 full time employees and offers a group health insurance plan for some of them. Cyril B. Korte and Jane E. Korte own a controlling interest in the company and contend the HHS mandate violates their Catholic faith.

In the appeals court decision issued Friday, the majority concluded: “We hold that the plaintiffs – the business owners and their companies – may challenge the mandate. We further hold that compelling them to cover these services substantially burdens their religious exercise rights. Under RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) the government must justify the burden under the standard of strict scrutiny. So far it has not done so, and we doubt that it can. Because the RFRA claims are very likely to succeed and the balance of harms favors protecting the religious-liberty rights of the plaintiffs, we reverse and remand with instructions to enter preliminary injunctions.”

CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

This decision comes just days after the ACLJ filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, posted here, in the case of Gilardi v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The ACLJ urged the high court to overturn an appeals court decision that refused to permit companies and corporations from bringing religious liberty claims in challenging the Mandate.

To date, 40 for-profit business owners have filed legal challenges to the Mandate. The ACLJ has filed 7 cases in federal court including the Korte case. In addition to the direct challenges, the ACLJ has filed more than 15 amicus briefs backing other legal challenges to the HHS mandate.

Polling data from December 2012 shows Americans support a religious exemption to the mandate.

[nickcarraway]

These judges need to be seriously droned.

[Morgana]

I believe the judges are drones!

[Secret Agent Man]

If you really need conservative, Christian legal groups to support:

ACLJ

Liberty Counsel

Alliance Defense Fund

These guys are in the courts on almost all major cases being heard around the country, on the behalf of Constitutional, Conservative, Christian values. They have incredible success ratings. Most are in the high 80’s/low 90s, winning far, far more often than not. You really get an amazing bang for your buck when you support these groups, they don’t piss it away and don’t get anything for it.

[Servant of the Cross]

“We hold that the plaintiffs – the business owners and their companies – may challenge the mandate. We further hold that compelling them to cover these services substantially burdens their religious exercise rights. Under RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) the government must justify the burden under the standard of strict scrutiny. So far it has not done so, and we doubt that it can. Because the RFRA claims are very likely to succeed and the balance of harms favors protecting the religious-liberty rights of the plaintiffs, we reverse and remand with instructions to enter preliminary injunctions.”

gOp leadership in both the House and Senate should be holding press conferences and drawing up the de-fund 0bamacare legislation immediately!

[Farnsworth]

I’m sure along the way the case will meet a neo-Marxist activist judge that will overturn the lower courts decision.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Looking more and more like this was nothing but a throw-away to get the Julias and Sandra Flukes to the polls in 2012.

[tflabo]

ACLJ doing Yeoman’s work-— Jay and Jordan Sekulow et al—way to go and keep up the excellent work.

[Sgt_Schultze]

Wow, according to Terry McAwful and the libdems, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit hates women. Kudos to Jay and his group.

If you shop on Amazon Smile, you can elect ACLJ as the charity which will receive .5% of your eligible purchases