Posted on 11/08/2013 6:16:25 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike
(A.) Egyptian Gen Al-Sisi does.
Right now, sitting in an Egyptian jail is a man al-Sisi arrested for inciting terrorism. That man is Gehad al Hadad (Gehad is Farsi for "jihad").
Gehad also knows how the Muslim Brotherhood launders money using tax-exempt foundations.
As far as I know, Egypt does not have any limitations on obtaining information from terrorists---like prohibiting waterboarding, etc.
================================================
THE CLINTONS IN-HOUSE MUSLIM TERRORIST the Clintons tax-exempt foundation employed the Muslim Brotherhood activist.
Gehad el-Haddad
(The stupid Clintons did not know Gehad was Farsi for "jihad")
This senior Muslim Brotherhood official was employed by the William J. Clinton Foundation-----and was arrested in Cairo, charged with inciting violence.
Gehad el-Haddad served as one of the Muslim Brotherhoods top communications officials; he was a top Brotherhood official and adviser to Barack Obama's hand-picked Egyptian candidate, Morsi (now deposed).
Gehad el-Haddad served for five years as a top Brotherhood official and was employed at the Clinton Foundation, a tax-exempt do-good foundation founded by former President Bill Clinton. El-Haddad pushed the Muslim Brotherhoods Islamist agenda in the foreign press, where he was often quoted defending the Brotherhoods crackdown on civil liberties in Egypt.
Gehad became the public face of the Islamist terrorist organization soon after leaving his post at the Clinton Foundation.
Much of Gehad's official terroristic-type work with the Muslim Brotherhood took place while he was still claiming to be employed by the Clinton Foundation.
==========================================
IMHO, the global tipping point occurred when Egyptian General al-Sisi refused to take vacaying Obaba's call from MV. It affirmed Gen al-Sisi's determination not to let Obaba interfere with his plan to drive the Muslim Brotherhood out of Egyptian politics.
Al Sisi's got the lay of the land---he knows who's got the ear of our Muslim president.
Great post...!
Great point! Who that fancied STAYING ALIVE wouldn’t have lied to Holder’s Waco Burners..? It would have been childish and reckless to blurt it out.
That is true
Her gang rape assault did not fit Arab spring template from the left
And some GOPe even...
Let me guess the story was “Fake, but accurate”...
Personal dirt. But I have no way of knowing it’s true and I probably shouldn’t have even said anything. Truth is that personal dirt can be invented if there isn’t some already there, and maybe a person is inoculated a bit if everybody already knows the dirt.
In October of 2008 the media personalities were told by the media heads that if they or their guests reported on Obama’s eligibility issue their careers would be over and the lives of them and their loved ones were in question. The media heads said they did this because they had been told (by Soros, Axelrod, and Emanuel, according to Doug Hagmann who got statements and corroborating evidence from people involved after one of the media personalities gave him a signed statement about the meeting in which the threats were made) that if anybody reported on those things, the media company itself would be annihilated through anti-monopoly measures. Very similar to the Chrysler and/or AIG people being told they would be annihilated by the IRS if they made trouble for Obama giving all the money to the unions.
A well-placed source of mine says that Hagmann quieted down on the story after one of his confidential sources was killed. He wanted to protect his other sources - one of whom has since fled the country in fear for her and her child’s life, as confirmed by Cold Case Posse Commander Mike Zullo, who also said that there are others he knows. Another investigator checking up on Hagmann’s claims and information reported that Glenn Beck left Fox because of those threats - since Fox refused to provide bodyguards for his secretary who was receiving threats and intimidation daily.
There is an over-arching pattern of threats and intimidation against the media and other people who are perceived as a threat to Obama’s fundamental transformation of the US from a free country to a third-world dictatorship. Arpaio’s presser (announcing a criminal investigation of document fraud for Obama’s BC and selective service registration) was overshadowed by the sudden death of Andrew Breitbart on the same day, less than 5 hours after Breitbart had called Arpaio and agreed that Arpaio’s case is compelling... and on the same day that Rush Limbaugh received a package treated as a bomb threat because it referred to 2 famous assassinations. A tech at the coroner’s office was blatantly poisoned with arsenic a couple days before the Breitbart autopsy was due to be made public - an autopsy that didn’t even claim to check for the most probable form of assassination for Breitbart. The symptoms of blatant arsenic poisoning come a half-hour after exposure so it would have been really easy for the police to catch the perpetrator but they refused to do a real investigation, and what little they did was filled with lies (such as the claim that the doctors let Cormier go after his first visit with poisoning symptoms because they believed he might have “just” had the imminently-fatal condition of “perforated bowel”...) The whole thing suggest collusion between the doctors, police, and somebody who wanted Breitbart dead and wanted the coroner to claim it was a natural heart attack.
It’s actually quite similar to the Michael Hastings death. The videotape was available at 4am so that the OTHER MEDIA MEMBERS would know he died from an explosion and not a car crash - right after he had asked to drive his neighbor’s car because he believed his was being tampered with in order to kill him and silence him from reporting on John Brennan. Brennan is the guy who oversaw the sanitization of Obama’s passport file from Jan-March of 2008. The killing was blatant enough that the media would get the message. But the coroner’s office covered up for it “officially” so no real investigation and charges would ever happen.
The gal who reported on Fast and Furious - I keep forgetting her name - had her computer messed with around the same time as Obama’s regime had somebody tell her to back off her stories. If they were only after her information - like they were with the reporter whose confidential notes were taken without a warrant when the feds raided the home in pursuit of her husband’s potato gun - they would have tried to hide the fact that they were messing with her computer. But that wasn’t their intention. Their intention was to intimidate her into silence, so they made her computer turn off and on in the middle of the night.
This is the kind of crap that is becoming more and more routine with these lawless thugs, now that Holder can stand in the way of any law enforcement efforts.
They messed with Orly’s car, and they most likely messed with my husband’s van the day after I was put in touch with Lt Col Terry Lakin’s team, to provide evidence to refute the presumption of regularity in the HDOH’s actions. He could have been killed by an explosion caused by sparking right next to the engine because the sheathing of the wires had been cut. Fortunately he noticed something wrong before it reached that point, but all the electronics except lights were fried and he was SCARED. I’m sure they could have done something that would have killed him outright but that was not their intention. Their intention was to silence me. IMHO
In the end they didn’t even need to do that because they just got Denise Lind to rule that Constitutional and statutory authorization has nothing to do with whether combat orders in a foreign country are lawful (cough). (Too bad somebody in the chain of command didn’t take Lind at her word and “lawfully” authorize some Hellfires to Benghazi on 9-11-12...)
How they got her to do that...... is anybody’s guess...
How they get ANYBODY to do what they want is left to our collective imagination...
What is it he actually lied about? From my cursory reading of what is reported today (which I’m sure isn’t complete) it looks like he lied about actually being present during the attack. He lied to make himself appear more prominent.
Isn’t this the same thing Jesse Jackson did in reference to the assassination of Martin Luther King? He claimed he was cradling King in his arms as he died, when in fact that has been shown to be false. But does that mean King wasn’t killed, or that James Earl Ray can use Jackson’s lie to show he is innocent?
I hope and pray that the Egyptians will come forward with the evidence in a way that the entire US system is too compromised to ever do.
gaijin, always good to see you around.
Heavy.
It’s always darkest before the dawn.
Ms Logan was probably threatened with a re enactment of her Cairo experience, and so, did as she was told..
His official stance is that he actually made it to the compound during the night of the attack and that the account in the book and as reported in the 60 min report is accurate. The only mistruth his admits to was the account he gave to his supervisor who ordered him to not travel to the compound during the night of the attack. He provides his reason for lying to his supervisor in the Daily Beast interview. I believe his statements as reported in the book and the 60min story. The administration is fabricating a smear campaign to provide coved for H. Clinton and her upcoming run for the White House.
Sharyl Atkisson is the reporter whose computer turned off and on in the night. I knew I’d remember it when I wasn’t in a hurry.
Thanks Hotlanta Mike. Meme-building by portraying oneself as culpable but victimized:
CBS and Benghazi: Whats the Larger Relevance?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3089115/posts
Simon & Schuster to Pull Benghazi Book Amid Questions of Accuracy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3089172/posts
Well I think this Dylan Davies was there and every word he told Logan was correct. If he changed his story when he was grilled by the FBI it was because he didn’t want to die.
This is a massive cover-up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.