Posted on 11/07/2013 1:10:27 PM PST by grundle
In a new twist on lawsuits against Obama-Care, TN attorney Van Irion filed a national class action in Federal court. The suit challenges "ObamaCare" on the basis that Congress is not authorized by the Constitution to regulate health care. Mr. Irion is asking the courts to re-evaluate the Commerce clause precedent, arguing that current precedent in effect destroys the intent of the Constitution and specifically the 10th Amendment.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacaresettlement.com ...
Encore. More lawsuits against DeathPanelCare
I argued that from the beginning. The basis of the Constitutional challenge should have been Article 1, Section 8, and the Tenth Amendment. The outcome would have been the same, but it would have generated a national debate about the enumerated powers of the federal government.
That’s a nice family ya got there Mr. Roberts.
Blackmail, I know. But I also think Kagan has certain powers that enable her to change people’s minds. Had she ever taken any hypnosis or ‘psy ops’ classes? All I know is, the King was REALLY anxious to get her on the court before the big decision.
What about the health and welfare clause?
Congress is not authorized by the Constitution to regulate firearms. Doesn't stop them though.
“What about the health and welfare clause?”
It says “promote the general welfare” which is a State Dept. function and has nothing to do with your ability to exist!!!
It certainly has nothing to do with spending one cent for anyones existance, including keeping them alive..
By the constitution, every welfare program should be eliminated today!!!!
How do I join?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.