To: Pollster1
Laws restricting our God-given right to keep and bear arms by definition infringe on that right. Such laws are thus inherently and unavoidably unconstitutional. Its not a hard concept to understand, and no legitimate government would try to work around the protections of our basic human rights.Try explaining that to a cop who doesn't see any contradiction between "presumption of innocence" and their efficacious tactic of lying to a suspect to obtain incriminating evidence.
70 posted on
11/07/2013 11:45:47 AM PST by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: papertyger
Try explaining that to a cop who doesn't see any contradiction between "presumption of innocence" and their efficacious tactic of lying to a suspect to obtain incriminating evidence. I'd be careful what I tried to explain to a cop on the warpath. I might end up with a $6k bill for an intrusive search, and I'd just as soon not go through that.
79 posted on
11/07/2013 1:04:59 PM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson