Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123

“All U.S. citizens have a right to keep and bear arms,” he added, “but I do not believe that they have a right to use them irresponsibly.”

Isn’t that what the existing criminal laws are for? He’s talking pre-crime controls.


27 posted on 11/07/2013 10:00:39 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
Isn’t that what the existing criminal laws are for? He’s talking pre-crime controls.

Exactly!

In fact, what he is saying is he believes "government" has the authority to PREVENT citizens from using them "irresponsibly." All the while, government gets to define "irresponsibly" as whatever the majority female voting public will accept!

63 posted on 11/07/2013 11:30:12 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson