Skip to comments.
Guns & Ammo Fires Editor After Publishing Editorial Calling for Gun Control
Mediaite ^
| 11/7/13
| Andrew Kirell
Posted on 11/07/2013 9:39:45 AM PST by jimbo123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
1
posted on
11/07/2013 9:39:45 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
LOL
Private sector blowback.
Needs to be applied to the public sector.
2
posted on
11/07/2013 9:41:06 AM PST
by
AlmaKing
To: jimbo123
Nothing wrong with gun control: who wants to WASTE bullets, ammo’s gotten expensive.
I suspect what he ACTUALLY is supporting is Involuntary Citizen Disarmament. . . .
3
posted on
11/07/2013 9:41:53 AM PST
by
Salgak
(http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
To: jimbo123
His first name fits him. Good for G&A.
4
posted on
11/07/2013 9:42:39 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(If govmt is stockpiling guns, ammo, food, & meds, don't you think it's a good idea to do the same?)
To: jimbo123
Guns & Ammo Fires Editor After Publishing Editorial Calling for Gun ControlWhy was this even allowed to be published to begin with? It can't be just the editor in on this....can it?
5
posted on
11/07/2013 9:45:08 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: AlmaKing
6
posted on
11/07/2013 9:45:10 AM PST
by
thorvaldr
To: jimbo123
so why was it even allowed to be printed??
7
posted on
11/07/2013 9:45:35 AM PST
by
ealgeone
(obama, border)
To: Puppage
The editor fired himself, too.
8
posted on
11/07/2013 9:45:51 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
The editor should have reviewed the article before publishing, correct? Was he just testing the waters to see what the response would be?
9
posted on
11/07/2013 9:46:11 AM PST
by
AlmaKing
To: jimbo123
Of course there should be gun right limits, for example, rusty guns should be limited. No individual has the right to put a gun away wet. A gun should never be used to destroy another gun. Advertising a real gun for sale, and then switching it with a candy gun is not a constitutional right.
I could go on, but I’m not sure silly gun talk is protected by the second amendment.
To: jimbo123
Watch where Metcalf ends up. This was a planned mission to get this editorial in a prominent gun publication. Now you will see it endlessly cited by every anti-2A group and politician in the country. Like Fast & Furious, this editorial was pushed to back the anti's position. Metcalf will be rewarded handsomely for taking the flak.
11
posted on
11/07/2013 9:47:35 AM PST
by
Paine in the Neck
(Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
To: jimbo123
I strongly suspect if there hadnt been so many threats to cancel Dick would still have a job. G&A cares nothing about your rights or Constitution. All they care about is making $$$. Any right thinking gun rag would have never entertained much less publish such trash.
12
posted on
11/07/2013 9:49:19 AM PST
by
556x45
To: jimbo123
I made a mistake by publishing the column, he continued. I thought it would generate a healthy exchange of ideas on gun rights. I miscalculated, pure and simple. I was wrong, and I ask your forgiveness.Ya think?
13
posted on
11/07/2013 9:49:24 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
He had his Zumbo moment, ‘deed he did.
14
posted on
11/07/2013 9:50:53 AM PST
by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: All
15
posted on
11/07/2013 9:51:18 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: Puppage
THERE IS MORE TO THIS THAN MEETS THE EYE. Guns and Ammo should go down for this. There are other mags—and new ones to be born.
16
posted on
11/07/2013 9:52:41 AM PST
by
SC_Pete
To: jimbo123
“The fact is, all constitutional rights are regulated, always have been, and need to be.
Gee, and here I thought there were gun laws of various facets around the country, “Dick”?
17
posted on
11/07/2013 9:53:00 AM PST
by
A_Former_Democrat
("I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,")
To: AlmaKing
He did! And let it go through. The magazine should pay the price—there is more to this story.
18
posted on
11/07/2013 9:53:33 AM PST
by
SC_Pete
To: Paine in the Neck
YES!!!! It was INTENTIONAL. It was SUBVEWRSIVE. It was UNAMERICAN. And Guns and Ammo needs to go down for this crap.
19
posted on
11/07/2013 9:54:34 AM PST
by
SC_Pete
To: Paine in the Neck
I wonder about so many of those writers/hunting hosts, (Metcalf was one I did wonder about); then there are some that are for real, (Tactical show hosts, Teddy, Pig Man, and Bone Collector; ya I actually watch those shows here along the Yukon when it's minus 60).
No middle ground on gun control.
20
posted on
11/07/2013 9:55:05 AM PST
by
Eska
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson