Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
My position is that, once you allow the precedent of cops being able to do that to somebody, then they will wind up being allowed to do it to ANYBODY.

I believe the cops were required to get a warrant from a county judge, weren't they?

127 posted on 11/08/2013 11:04:04 AM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Alaska Wolf
I believe the cops were required to get a warrant from a county judge, weren't they?

Read the documents at the linked article. Although the judge authorized an "anal cavity search", a jury will likely find that the scope of what the cops did went far beyond what was authorized.

128 posted on 11/08/2013 12:00:29 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson