“When the RNC calls for money, tell them no, that if Christy is the kind of candidate that they support as opposed to Cuccinelli, you will send your donations directly to specific candidates.”
I have told them a lot more than that this morning! Idiots must run the RNC. They could have helped Cuccinelli a lot more and won that race except for the fact they don’t want to be associated with the Tea Party!
If they don’t want to associate with me (Tea Party) I won’t bother associating my money with them either. And I sure as hell won’t be busting my *ss getting out the vote for them. Let’s see the elitist do grass roots organizing. Normal everyday working people hate the elitist RNC and their chosen candidates.
But, look who John McCain called in to save his *ss when he was running for reelection, Sarah Palin! I doubt they have figured out the obvious though.
IMO, the RNC would rather have Democrats win than have the Tea Party win. They proved that last night in Virginia!
Republicans in my county in WA, have backed the development of a coal terminal that is being push by Obama and the unions, against the well-being of the county and the state. The coal terminal will only provide 40 or so direct jobs and lots and lots of negative impacts, but the Republicans jumped on the union bandwagon and paid the price for it in the election, today.
Every single Republican candidate lost because of the coal terminal. They committed political suicide to support union jobs despite the overwhelming opposition of the voters. It was nuts.
The county council has the final say on the coal terminal, so its done now. There is no way that the project will be approved. They may as well pack up and go home.
I agree, they proved that in VA.
I am thinking that we need a PAC to funnel donations to conservative candidates. I used to donate to the Congressional fund when it was headed by DeMint, but I have not donated since he left office.
We need a PAC that will vet candidates, both Republicans and Libertarians on the issues and where their money comes from. The PAC cannot have the TeaParty in the title. It would be good if the issues statement for the PAC could specify a constitutional approach to social issues, to prevent candidates from being side tracked on religion. Religion is a constitutional issue.