Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flaglady47; Mrs. Frogjerk

Brian did NOT refer to Sarvis as the tea party candidate and he complemented the tea party. This is amazing that someone can run with such an erroneous take on something.


38 posted on 11/06/2013 6:25:05 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: spacejunkie2001

I tuned in saw and heard Brian saying that a Tea Party candidate was responsible for taking away a percentage of votes from Cuccinelli. Who was he talking about than? Was there another candidate involved that I didn’t know about?


41 posted on 11/06/2013 6:56:43 AM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: spacejunkie2001

I just remembered that he said that the candidate that he was referring to was told by Ron Paul to drop out. So who was it if it wasn’t the “libertarian”? Brian did not say “Libertarian” when referring to this candidate. Otherwise I would have agreed with him because Sarvis ended up screwing Cuccinelli by staying in. I wouldn’t have taken any notice if he did not say “tea party”. Like I said before, maybe he just said it by accident.

If it was a slip up, he does need to be more careful because the Tea Party has been blamed enough for the failures of the GOP. I’m tired of hearing it. That is why I had a strong reaction to his statement.


44 posted on 11/06/2013 7:18:10 AM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson