He was a plant paid for by Dems to hurt Cucinelli, which he did. Mission accomplished.
Except that he wasn’t.
Sarvis was the official libertarian candidate, he was not a part of a long running conspiracy to get him to the top of the Virginia libertarian party.
The democrats didn’t pay for him or create his candidacy, they contributed to his campaign, knowing that it would hurt the conservative, that is very different from what you are claiming.
Read post 209, the left often counts on the libertarians to help them win elections.
He won the libertarian nomination right?
The Libertarians for Virginia website seems to be excited about pushing Sarvis.
http://lpva.com/
You know Democrats poured money into Todd Akin's primary campaign. Do you think he was a plant?
I agree Sarvis was bankrolled by Democrats up to no good, but all the libertarians I know in Northern VA went and voted for him. They obviously didn't feel he was a plant.
Most libertarians are actually social liberals first and foremost. You will almost always find, especially among the young crowd (which is the bulk of their support) that drug legalization, abortion on demand, peacenik foreign policy, etc, is really what drives them. Infact the fastest way to drive a libertarian from their party is to point out that actual libertarian positions call for an end to federal government social welfare programs.