Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big-time Obama bundler bankrolling Libertarian in Virginia gubernatorial race.
redstate.com ^ | 11/5/13 | Moe Lane

Posted on 11/05/2013 8:34:30 AM PST by cotton1706

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Oshkalaboomboom

You are correct Sir......Dems are just as disappointed with Obama as republicans. The Republicans have not considered Ken’s turn against the tea party as the problem with gubernatorial race in Virginia... just the lousy third party candidates taking votes away. A third party wouldn’t be an issue if Republicans were true conservative rather than a branch of the one party socialist system we have now. Remember, right-wing think tanks with the help of the insurance industry wrote Obama care. So, the establishment Republicans feign outrage in public while quietly supporting it behind the scenes.


21 posted on 11/05/2013 9:42:05 AM PST by anton-national (Ken cuccunelli, nullification, Virginia Gubernatorial, Obama care, neo-cons, one part system)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

That’s the problem. The Democrats are organized as a “community”. Republicans are divided, disgusted with “what is” and completely disorganized. With no “cure” in sight.


22 posted on 11/05/2013 9:47:23 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

“THU NOV 15, 2012 AT 01:54 PM PST
Libertarians provided the margin for Democrats in at least nine elections

As we’ve perused last week’s election returns, we’d noticed a number of races where Libertarian candidates appear to have played spoiler for Republicans—certainly, more than we’re accustomed to. While we haven’t run a comparison with prior cycles, we’ve identified no fewer than nine contests in 2012 where the Libertarian received more votes than the difference between the Democratic and Republican candidates. What’s more, none of these involved the typical 1 or maybe 2 percent you ordinarily expect a Lib to garner: Looking at the three-way vote, all but one were over 3 percent, and three took 6 percent or more, with a high of 6.5 percent in the Montana Senate race. These definitely seem like unusually high figures.”


23 posted on 11/05/2013 9:52:42 AM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Third Party drain-off;

Pure Clinton 1992 and 1996 tactic—extremely successful as perfected by McAuliffe himself and the other Clinton c*cks*ckers with whom we’re still unfortunately afflicted.


24 posted on 11/05/2013 10:10:18 AM PST by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker8877

Ross Perot was not on Clinton’s payroll as Sarvis is.


25 posted on 11/05/2013 12:35:40 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Probably getting a little something for himself as well.


26 posted on 11/05/2013 2:43:32 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson