Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: diogenes ghost

If Lockheed is announcing this it means that they’ve already built it and it’s operational and they’re moving on to the next one.


6 posted on 11/02/2013 7:43:40 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: fella

“If Lockheed is announcing this it means that they’ve already built it and it’s operational and they’re moving on to the next one.”

Yup. Next gen has probably been built also. They must have the mach 6 plane in operation for the past 10 years.


11 posted on 11/02/2013 7:51:17 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: fella; KeyLargo; EveningStar; SunkenCiv
If Lockheed is announcing this it means that they’ve already
built it and it’s operational and they’re moving on to the next one.
very plausible..very likely 3 generations ahead...
..the info given / released to future foes & allies..USAF still has teeth, (for now)

12 posted on 11/02/2013 7:51:30 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: fella

“If Lockheed is announcing this it means that they’ve already built it and it’s operational and they’re moving on to the next one.”

I would not take that so.

I would suspect that instead they have conducted a series of test programs with concept vehicles, flying testbeds, and, technology demonstrators over many years that have given them a very good idea of just exactly how their proposed hypersonic airplane should appear. Think Have Blue, Tacit Blue, Bird of Prey, etc.

Lockheed, and the government, display a pretty clear pattern here. Once an airframe has been developed, built, deployed, and, has rendered good deal of operational info....then it’s revealed. Think U-2, SR-71, and, F-117. All of which were well into production (if not already out of) and had been operational for some time before their release to the public.

No, the airplane illustrated does not exist yet. If it did, was flying regularly, and, considered “mature” technology then we would have pictures of it. Real pics released by LockMart, the DOD, the U.S. Air Force, etc., proving it existed. We don’t have that. We also don’t have pics of the tech demonstrators they’ve used to amass the data necessary to conceive of the design. They are still classified probably because they could reveal too much of the testing, teething, and, progress that got them to the proposed design.


17 posted on 11/02/2013 8:20:31 PM PDT by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: fella
If Lockheed is announcing this it means that they’ve already built it and it’s operational and they’re moving on to the next one.

I wouldn't count on that. Look at how LockMart's current big-ticket programs are doing.

This looks like nothing more than a conceptual sales pitch (one that, interestingly, provides a list of a bunch of previous similar tries that failed) that they slapped with the "SR-72" moniker to appear "official", make it sound infinitely cool and leverage the well-know "Blackbird" brand.


18 posted on 11/02/2013 8:23:13 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson