Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Review: ‘Double Down,’ on the 2012 election, by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann
The Washington Post ^ | November 1, 2013 | Peter Hamby

Posted on 11/02/2013 9:47:26 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike

By now, everyone knows that Mitt Romney’s inner circle was righteously peeved at New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for spending the final days of the 2012 presidential race arm-in-arm with President Obama as they toured the Jersey coastline after its thrashing by Hurricane Sandy. The buddy-buddy act boxed Romney out of national media coverage for days while lending the president some bipartisan street cred.

But it wasn’t just the storm. Christie had rankled Romney’s team throughout the campaign: He held back his endorsement as long as possible, flirted with big-shot GOP donors who begged him to jump into the race and used his prime-time address at the Republican National Convention to puff up his Garden State record — without mentioning Romney once.

For Romney’s aides, dealing with Christie’s overbearing team was about as pleasurable as a traffic jam on the New Jersey Turnpike. For Christie’s staff in Trenton, the feeling toward the Romney machine was pretty much mutual.

Many months after Romney’s loss, that toxic relationship is revealed in page-turning detail in “Double Down,” a chronicle of last year’s grind-it-out election by journalists Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. The authors deploy the conversation-driving formula that propelled their previous book, “Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime,” to bestseller status and a movie deal with HBO. (The same network has already optioned the rights to “Double Down.”) The duo’s M.O. — translating insider politics for mass-market readers with behind-the-scenes reporting and Gonzo flair — is custom-built for today’s news cycle, in which scoops explode on Twitter and oblige the rest of the political media to chase, confirm, refute, scrutinize, analyze to death. The digital blast radius for “Double Down” is infinite.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; chrischristie; christobamabromance; cruz; doubledown; gop; markhalperin; mittromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Is it any wonder Hunstman fit right in with the Obama Administration?
1 posted on 11/02/2013 9:47:26 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Well, another way to put it is that Chris Christie pulled a Romney on Romney. Romney was busy doing the same thing to other Republican candidates throughout the last several presidential elections. And it was his operatives, lent to McCain, who betrayed Sarah Palin.

So, Romney certainly knows what he’s talking about.


2 posted on 11/02/2013 9:51:38 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

And note well that Huntsman was behind the attacks on Herman Cain

May Huntsman’s shame increase


3 posted on 11/02/2013 9:52:24 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

The RINOs/Republican-E’s will push Tubby for the POTUS ‘16 election granted he doesn’t pull a James Gandolfini and die of a heart attack first. And the Treason party will push Hitlery. That leaves Ted Cruz and/or Palin who MUST campaign on a 3rd party ticket, that’s the only way we are going to win over these slime buckets.


4 posted on 11/02/2013 9:56:18 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (What do we want? Time travel. When do we want it? It's irrelevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Christie's speech was all about himself. I was really surprised that the RNC allowed that speech. I assume they had read it beforehand. Christie is a self-serving Pol. Nothing more. He calls himself a Republican but he is nothing but a RINO. I HOPE we find someone worthy of the Presidency to run in 2016. I am already of the belief that it is too late to save this once great country, but most of my friends still have hope. I HOPE I am wrong.
5 posted on 11/02/2013 10:00:32 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

there’s no way that RINO from New Jersey is going to be the nominee.
He’s just like the federal government - bloated, overweight, and out of control!


6 posted on 11/02/2013 10:02:01 AM PDT by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Huntsman is mentioned in the article?


7 posted on 11/02/2013 10:14:10 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (WWLD? What would LaRussa do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

> Chris Christie pulled a Romney on Romney.

Very well put. Christie should be starved of any support.


8 posted on 11/02/2013 10:15:30 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wewereright

I am unfortunately a resident of NJ. I am torn as to whether to sit out Tuesday’s election. I really hate the idea of pulling the lever for Crispy Crème Christie, although the rat woman running against him would be far worse. At least Christie vetoed some of the most draconian gun grabs the rats were pushing.


9 posted on 11/02/2013 10:18:37 AM PDT by hdbc (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wewereright
there’s no way that RINO from New Jersey is going to be the nominee. He’s just like the federal government - bloated, overweight, and out of control!

Agreed. Nothing at all appealing about Christie. I will stay home rather than vote for him.

10 posted on 11/02/2013 10:20:09 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
I don't like these Halperin and Heilemann or their books for several reasons.

They are typical MSM journalists. During the campaign they parrot the dishonest MSM narrative. They never say anything insightful, provocative or honest. After the campaign is over and the votes have been counted Halperin and Heileman go back and sell a book based on what they call the real inside story. Some of it is just refuting the lies they told during the campaign. Other parts of their books are one sided attacks by Washington insiders and campaign insiders on convenient targets.

During the 2008 campaign the MSM including the authors told story after story about what a loving marriage John Edwards and his wife had. In their book the authors gave some limited accounts of the real story.

The authors repeated the attacks on Sarah Palin by the McCain campaign staffers and portrayed the most vicious gossip as undisputed facts.

This is just more MSM dishonesty.

11 posted on 11/02/2013 10:31:08 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
(A BIG Thanks to FReeper Joe Pro Bono for the pic!!)



Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


12 posted on 11/02/2013 10:35:15 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
"New N.J. laws from last session at a 168-year low Christie makes history with fewest signed"

4:21 PM, Jan. 27, 2013

http://www.app.com/article/20130126/NJNEWS1002/301260106/New-N-J-laws-from-last-session-168-year-low?gcheck=1

Written by

Michael Symons

"Not in nearly 170 years, and perhaps far longer, have fewer laws been enacted in New Jersey than the 80 bills signed by Gov. Chris Christie in the last legislative session."

I would have agreed that Christie has about a 0.00% chance of winning the 2016 Republican nomination. Until I read that one Republican poll has Christie leading the field for the GOP nomination in South Carolina

http://www.conservativeintel.com/1030-conservative-intel-poll-of-scsen-and-fits-primary-2016/#

Oh, and Romney ran an awful campaign. That was his problem.

13 posted on 11/02/2013 10:42:40 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hdbc

I recommend you go out and vote for Christie. It is apparent to me, that too many conservatives stayed home during the last election and thus we have Obama’s 2nd term. If too many chose to stay home, the “rat woman” may just win.


14 posted on 11/02/2013 11:09:00 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wewereright
Yeah but the Repugnican party is now the RINO party so I think they will push Tubby or some other RINO, they sure as hell aren't going to nominate Cruz or Palin, so I was saying we need a 3rd party. I mean for freak sake, they criticize Ted Cruz more than they do Obama. Incredible. How many of these RINOs have criticized Obamacare? I can't think of one. But I can name plenty who viciously attack Cruz.


15 posted on 11/02/2013 11:10:59 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (What do we want? Time travel. When do we want it? It's irrelevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Who is silly enough to waste a few hours reading such books? This kind of inside baseball on inside the Beltway politics would make me sick just reading the forward. Washington DC is such a sicko thieving money grubbing city////// ripping off the taxpayer and now the medical services consumer....

For the hypnotized this is compelling drama with interesting personalities. For me it is a complete zero. Like our zero 0bama


16 posted on 11/02/2013 11:16:06 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Poor wittle Progressive Liberal Romney.

I have no respect for this lying, progressive liberal.

He proclaimed in January 2012 that he was a ‘serverely conservative’ Governor of Massachusetts and had always been Pro-Life, then in August of 2012 he comes out in support of many of the facets of the Gay Agenda and Abortion in the cases of Rape, Incest, Life and Health of the morning.

On top of his mendacious ways, he refused to fight against the weakest of all Democrat Nominees a GOP Nominee has ever gone up against.

Probably because, as he record as Governor bears out, most of Obama’s policies are policies that Mitt Romney really believes in.


17 posted on 11/02/2013 11:21:49 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

FO Peter Head.

You still fulminating over Romney?

grow up and move on.


18 posted on 11/02/2013 11:23:26 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; hdbc
I recommend you go out and vote for Christie. It is apparent to me, that too many conservatives stayed home during the last election and thus we have Obama’s 2nd term. If too many chose to stay home, the “rat woman” may just win.

And as long as the GOP has people such as you who willingly go along with their manipulation and their "lessor of two evils" game, we will continue to get horrible, Progressive Liberal candidates like Mitt Romney, Chris Christie, or Globalist, principleless, Moderates such Bob Dole or John McCain.
19 posted on 11/02/2013 11:25:04 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; hdbc

In a similar vain I reply: It is obvious you decided to retain your purity and stayed home rather than to vote for McCain or Romney, and thus are partly responsible for 0bama’s election & re-election.

Yes I voted for Romney in the election because I preferred him to re-electing Obama. I supported and voted in the primary for an more conservative candidate, but that person did not end up being the Republican Party’s nominee. Thus instead of going home and sulking on election day; I went out voted for Romney, knowing that he would be immensely better than 0bama.

If you stayed home because Romney didn’t meet your ‘political purity/conservative/whatever’ standards, the you are as responsible for the re-election of 0bama, as those Democrats, Communists, and progressives who voted for him.


20 posted on 11/02/2013 11:38:04 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson