Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap
One of the biggest blunders was decommissioning the SR-71... with the preposterous excuse that it was “Too expensive to operate”.

Special mechanics, special pilots/training, and most expensive - special fuel delivered by aerial tankers in faraway places. If you wanted to track the SR-71 you might follow the KC-135 tanker carrying its special fuel and wait for the blackbird to show up. Knowing this, I suspect the AF would have a whole fleet of KC-135's full of the special fuel in the air all over the world, with only one or two actually meeting up with an SR-71. Expensive enough yet?

Also, I believe improvements in sensing and anti-aircraft missile tech made it increasingly dangerous to fly over hostile territory. Maybe there's still a need for recon, but is a manned aircraft still needed for this job?

OTOH I have to agree that decommissioning the SR-71 was a mistake. Beautiful aircraft, unique design, still the fastest thing in the air. It should have been kept flying, but for pure research into the science of speed. If they quit trying to keep it so secret, a lot of the expense would go away.

18 posted on 11/02/2013 7:29:20 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ZOOKER

We will have to agree to disagree: At the time the SR-71 was decommissioned there was nothing that even got close to shooting it down. To compare the cost of operating a totally successful aircraft to developing a new one isn’t even close... as far as the special fuel...why wouldn’t the same qualities be needed for the newer aircraft if it is going to operate in the same environment? In my opinion the SR-71 was decommissioned for political reasons. I have nothing to offer as proof other than the liberal policy of F&*king up any military program that is successful!!!


19 posted on 11/02/2013 7:39:57 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ZOOKER
It leaked like a bucket with holes in it. Until it got up in the air/inner space and heated up.
But it make a person wonder what the hell Kelly Johnsons vision was for future aircraft. A aircraft that could go that fast, and so advanced built way back then? When the technology wasn't available they way it is now?
26 posted on 11/02/2013 8:10:01 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson