Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

It would be indeed be safer. Just the fact that it would be not be a pressurized water reactor, and would be operating near atmospheric pressure makes it a lot safer in my eyes.

And the reactor cannot melt down by inherent design.

Gas turbines are great. But they need fuel to run, and they do emit atmospheric pollutants.

Just because a single plant has not been built, or was built and shut down doesn’t mean it can’t be done or that it cannot be done at a profit.

If that were the case, we would have never built airliners because the first planes crashed and were unsafe.


57 posted on 11/01/2013 6:28:31 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Of course it could be done. I just gave the reasons why it is not being done.


67 posted on 11/02/2013 7:24:27 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson