Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Why we AREN’T doing it went back to the early 1950s. The old Atomic Energy Commission was experimenting with both Thorium and Uranium/Plutonium reactors, and when DOD found they could NOT make a nuclear weapon with Thorium chose the Uranium/Plutonium cycle as a “dual-use” technology. . .


30 posted on 11/01/2013 2:22:41 PM PDT by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Salgak

I suppose from the standpoint of weapons grade, if you are going to use it (as we did) that does make sense.


31 posted on 11/01/2013 2:24:05 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Salgak
what is the half life of the expended fuel?

The regulatory regime, for all intents and purposes, precludes the building of a commercial lftr. The regulations are not so stringent for military use, so if they want a mobile power plant that produces 1,300 deg. f liguid for desalinization of water and production of electricity, that might be the ticket to develop the technology.

77 posted on 11/03/2013 4:43:58 AM PST by frithguild (You can call me Snippy the Anti-Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson