Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

It is true that there isn’t anything that is unlimited, in a sense, but with Thorium, it is a lot more available (than Uranium, at least) produces its own U233 which can be reused, and generates a lot less waste that is a lot less radioactive (or at least is radioactive for a shorter period of time, I think I remember seeing 10 half lives in 300 years for the longest lived isotope, but don’t hold me to that)

On its face, it can’t be weaponized, and while there are some thorium decay isotopes that can be separated that decay directly into weapons grade uranium, the half life is short enough to make it impractical for that purpose, or so I am told.

From what I know of it, it seems like a winner to me.


12 posted on 11/01/2013 2:06:01 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

“From what I know of it, it seems like a winner to me.”

Definitely — safe, cheap, abundant energy and we could be truly energy independent, not have to depend on the oil producing nations.


15 posted on 11/01/2013 2:10:25 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson