I would be interested in the crime statistics starting the day when stop and frisk was outlawed until it was reinstated.
Last night on Hannity, Giuliani provided impressive stats regarding the reduction in murders that primarily involve Black-on-Black crimes. Stop-n-Frisk is just one tool in the package of measures used to realize the results.
So if the issue is about liberty, is it reasonable to deny law abiding citizens the right to arms while not doing anything proactive to prevent criminals from carrying? If the first step towards statism is outlawing guns, is the second step of Stop-n-Frisk any worse than the first?