“Why would anyone ever put their personal information on this mess?”
because the law forces them to if their plans that they liked and wanted to keep were cancelled
Sebelius will not shut down this system that does not protect consumers from hackers — the same consumers who liked their plans — the same consumers that they had to protect from “bad apple” insurance companies that the consumers nonetheless liked — but which consumers they cannot [read WILL NOT because they could after all shut it down] protect from hackers [identity theft a worse outcome than a bad apple policy that the said consumer did after all like] because Sebelius REFUSES to shut down a system that, as she was speaking, was nonetheless down.
Don’t flame my sentence structure! Just trying to capture their logic.
How could Sebelius not agree to shut down a system which leaves consumer information vulnerable, when it is down anyway?!?
BTW, Forbes said in 2010 they KNEW 93 million plans would be cancelled
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c60bf53ef019b0081c861970c-500wi