Kathleen Sebelius: ‘Men often do need maternity care’(Really? name one that conceived )

washington Times ^ | October 31, 2013 | By Cheryl K. Chuml

[sickoflibs]

Republican Rep. Renee Ellmers : (clip) : “As far as [Obamacare’s] essential health benefits, correct me if I’m wrong — do men not have to buy maternity care?”

clip

Ms. Sebelius: “Well, an insurance policy has a series of benefits whether you use them or not.”

Ms. Ellmers: “And that is why health care premiums are increasing, because we are forcing them to buy things that they will never need. Thank you.”

Ms. Sebelius: “The individual policies cover families. Men often do need maternity care for their spouses and for their families, yes.”

Ms. Ellmers: “A single male, aged 32, does not need maternity coverage. To be the best of your knowledge, has a man ever delivered a baby?”

[sickoflibs]

RE :”At the end, the lady in the audience laughs at Sebelius. Sebelius is not amused. We must continue to mock them; it seems that’s the only thing that bothers them.”

I am doing my best at that and enjoying it too, that a ‘two-fer’

[Dalberg-Acton]

Thomas Beatie

A bull sh* ABC "news" story from July 3, 2008.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Oh wait waaaiiit.....here it comes! If a single man does not have maternity care then he is a participant in the....

WAR AGAINST WOMEN!!!

[sickoflibs]

She didnt try that one

[napscoordinator]

I think it is a difficult situation. Sure a 26 year old man does not need insurance for babies. However, at 29, he may be married with a baby on the way and if he marries some lower economical type lady who does not have the ability to make a living, it is smart to have that insurance on his policy.

[LyinLibs]

[LyinLibs]

[Nifster]

As with everyone else in this dictator’s administration, she has drunk the Kool Aid. They should all be impeached and jailed.

None dare call it treason

[Nifster]

Well said....now if some at least will hear

[a fool in paradise]

She needs remedial sex edumacation.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Sebelius and her kook friends have taken the “transgender” freak show to a whole new level.

[a fool in paradise]

I want my manturnity leave and an Obamaphone!

[pgkdan]

She’s only covered if she’s married to him and he has a family policy. If he bought single overage he will still pay for maternity coverage which he will never use and it’s benefits can’t be conferred upon any other person.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”I think it is a difficult situation. Sure a 26 year old man does not need insurance for babies. However, at 29, he may be married with a baby on the way and if he marries some lower economical type lady who does not have the ability to make a living, it is smart to have that insurance on his policy.”

WTF??
No, this one is black and white.

If you can get pregnant and you think that's likely to happen for any reason then you pay more to have that coverage added, same with if you marry someone in that boat who you want to share a policy with.

You dont make everyone else who cant use it buy the same coverage they dont need just so yours is paid for by others.

Jeeze

[a fool in paradise]

RE :”This administration is the most deceitful, lying in our history. They will lie to your face while looking you right in the eye. “

They lie like Stalinists.

[what's up]

it is smart to have that insurance on his policy.

No...it's not smart.

It's idiotic because he will never use it.

If he gets married his wife will have the coverage on her individual policy; no reason ever for the man himself to have it.

[privatedrive]

“To be the best of your knowledge, has a man ever delivered a baby?”

Well, actually, doctors deliver babies every day...

[loveliberty2]

Thanks. Circulate to as many as you wish.

[Nifster]

roger that

[sickoflibs]

RE :”They lie like Stalinists.”

Sometimes they have to fib to get us to do the right thing.

Bill Maher recently said wrt this :”Americans are too f...ing stupid to be told the truth”

I am assuming he excludes himself from that.