[MeganC]

Sorry. I do NOT give the cops the ‘benefit of the doubt’ when they engage American citizens under far looser rules of engagement than do our soldiers in Afghanistan when THEY engage TERRORISTS!!!

That’s right! A freaking Taliban TERRORIST gets more consideration from the US government as to their ‘rights’ than does a 13 year old boy playing in his own neighborhood in suburban America.

See, if this kid has been in Afghanistan carrying a REAL Ak-47 he would not have been shot unless he fired first. And if he had been shot first the US soldier would be tried for a crime.

Therefore, so should this deputy be tried for a crime.

[CivilWarBrewing]

LOL! Okay, I’m moving away from this thread. The way you frame your argument made me change my mind. Hang the friggin’ Sheriff from the nearest tree. LOL!

[SpeakerToAnimals]

Sorry. I do NOT give the cops the ‘benefit of the doubt’ when they engage American citizens under far looser rules of engagement than do our soldiers in Afghanistan when THEY engage TERRORISTS!!!

.Plus one on that. I make the same argument all the time.