Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

Yet he’s charged with possession of an explosive, though the had none, both in the same article.


16 posted on 10/29/2013 6:47:25 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow

they should charge him with possession of bomb-making material — seems he had everything but the explosives.

Some on this thread theorized that perhaps someone else carried the explosive material — then it would all make sense.


18 posted on 10/29/2013 6:51:47 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson