Posted on 10/29/2013 6:23:10 PM PDT by Innovative
Also -- there was nothing about this in national news, I came across it purely by accident.
wot ping
Nothing about what the “bomb components” were.
I hope these idiots remain this stupid.
I guess there was an article about this in the NYT:
Mystery Surrounds Motive of Man With Bomb Parts in Bag
“...it was still unclear why he had tried to bring what the police described as all but one component needed to make a bomb aboard a Los Angeles-bound flight.
...There, a routine security inspection by Canadian officials uncovered various objects hidden in the pullout handle of his carry-on bag.
Neither the police nor prosecutors have specifically identified the objects other than to say that they are all the components necessary to make a bomb except the explosive material.
...Despite Mr. Piazzas innocuous appearance, he faces charges of possession of an explosive substance, conspiracy to transport an explosive substance on an airplane and endangering the safety of an airport or aircraft. “
Hopefully, he’s an EX-LAX Bound passenger now.
Mayhap a pressure cooker?
Ping.
This is a Threat Matrix list documenting threats within and without. Anyone wanting on or off please advise.
Ya want real surprise?
Your govenrment has welcomed in so many Muslims into the U.S., *all* your major airports are now encircled by fleets of taxis driven by Muslims, all circling around terminal areas and baggage claim areas, packed with thousands.
Speaks volumes!
Everything but the actual explosives, those were doubtless carried onto the plane by a cohort.
“all but one component”
Hidden by fellow pig molesting muzzie somewhere on the plane.
This makes no sense at all...
>the components necessary to make a bomb except the explosive material.
>he faces charges of possession of an explosive substance, conspiracy to transport an explosive substance on an airplane and endangering the safety of an airport or aircraft.
I see the NYT is still stuck on stupid.
The name didn't seem right, until I read that bit.
Yet he’s charged with possession of an explosive, though the had none, both in the same article.
Read some of the comments — some theorize that someone else on the plane carried the explosive and this guy carried everything else — that would make sense.
they should charge him with possession of bomb-making material — seems he had everything but the explosives.
Some on this thread theorized that perhaps someone else carried the explosive material — then it would all make sense.
Please add me to this ping list. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.