Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

It’s rude. We need a ruling.
***That’s an incredible understatement. The SCOTUS basically ushered in and empirical presidency by abrogating their responsibility. It was no less than the end of the constitutional republic. Far, far more than just “rude”.


988 posted on 11/01/2013 2:49:50 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

Even worse than SCOTUS, Congress abrogated their responsibility. This should have been debated and voted on in Congress when counting the electoral votes in 2009.


989 posted on 11/01/2013 2:54:36 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

What IF the assumption is always that a candidate IS eligible until proven NOT to be.

Where is it stated that the candidate must be vetted by the SCOTUS before he/she is nominated?

Seems the nominated candidate is eligible until such time as you show up on the steps of the supreme court waving his naturalization documents, in other words.


992 posted on 11/01/2013 3:02:56 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson