Beats me how one could apply the Constitution to someone whose identity is unknown.
***That’s precisely what the SCOTUS did.
I’m an Aussie, my take is probably somewhat off-beat, but I see this situation as a classic Catch22. Natural Born isn’t defined in your Constitution, so he’s assumed to be an NBC until such time as proven otherwise. Show the court his naturalization documents, and you’ve got a foreigner. But your privacy laws prevent access without his permission. That’s why his past is in lock-down.
Accessing his files without his permission would be conducting a criminal act and he would still not be accountable, and no one knows this better than his buddy Ayres: ‘Guilty as sin, free as bird’.