“Your interpretation leaves no purpose for the word “natural.””
I looked up ‘natural’. It said nothing about “two parents this or that”. You argue the word ‘natural’ like liberals argue the phrase “common sense”. In fact, in your argument they are synonyms of each other; “Why of course two parents..., it’s common sense”.
You would. The concept of "context" or "term of art" is apparently foreign to you.
This is such a silly statement, and several of your other comments have been so silly, that I feel i'm wasting my time responding to your commentary.
I don't care if the world "Natural" meant "Jumping jacks with polka dot shoes", the point remains, xzins' definition left it as a superfluous word. What it meant wasn't relevant, because the way he interpreted the phrase, it didn't need to even be there.
All xzins gets out of it is "born citizen." He simply leaves off the word "natural" as having no purpose whatsoever.