Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Minor v. Happersett also explicitedly states that the Constitution does not say “in words who shall be natural born citizens.”


792 posted on 10/31/2013 9:46:49 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
Minor v. Happersett also explicitedly states that the Constitution does not say “in words who shall be natural born citizens.”

A point I CONSTANTLY try to get through people's heads. Chief Justice Waite was Specifically referring to the 14th amendment when he made that statement, because it is on the basis of the 14th amendment that the suit was brought.

I.E. the 14th amendment does not create natural born citizens. But anyone who comprehends the natural law argument, already knew that.

841 posted on 10/31/2013 11:21:12 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson