Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp


Nobody is claiming that He is not an American Citizen. He is most certainly an American citizen who was granted citizenship by the authority of a Congressional statute in which they exercise their power of naturalization.

That is your assumption, a wrong one at that. A law may have been created to clarify what some like you did not understand but it doesn’t change the fact that the mother confers citizenship regardless of birth place. Read my previous posts about a mother visiting a country.

I have lived many years of my life overseas and it was well known that a mother confers citizenship and that anchor babies are not always accepted.


788 posted on 10/31/2013 9:30:48 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
That is your assumption, a wrong one at that. A law may have been created to clarify what some like you did not understand but it doesn’t change the fact that the mother confers citizenship regardless of birth place. Read my previous posts about a mother visiting a country.

Prior to 1922? I don't think so.

Don't care what the modern PRACTICE is. The current law does not affect the meaning of a law written in 1787. Prior to 1922, American women Married to foreigners in foreign countries did NOT have American children. They had children of their husbands nationality.

834 posted on 10/31/2013 11:15:44 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson