[Cboldt]

-- However, that is not really the point. The point is those who claim "natural born citizen" is defined by "natural law." We are asking for the page number to see if they are correct in their interpretation of the passage. --

I think I made exactly the point, what you seek does not exist. There is no code book of natural law. There may be treatises and similar that expound on natural law, but those writings are not binding law, anywhere.

That your opponent in argument can't produce what you demand is a slam dunk given.

[xzins]

And since it’s a slam dunk given, their definition derived, so they say,from “natural law” is open to question and to be assumed spurious.

[Las Vegas Ron]

There may be treatises and similar that expound on natural law, but those writings are not binding law, anywhere.

What do you mean?

Our Country is founded on the principle that our rights come from God and natural law.

Am I misinterpreting what you wrote?