To: Las Vegas Ron
I'm finding it very difficult to change position for expediency and for that, I will now be a troll a traitor and undermining Cruz.
This isn't about expediency, it is about the FACT that there is no legal definition/law in the Constitution, U.S. Law, or the rulings of the Supreme Court for a definition of "Natural Born" citizen that requires both parents to be US Citizens at the time of birth.
Just because SOME of the founders may have believed that it required 2 US Citizens, or some outside legal authority believed it required 2 US Citizens does not provide the necessary legal framework/foundation/definition to support your contention.
It is only your opinion, and those who agree with you. It is not law.
167 posted on
10/29/2013 1:18:46 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
It is only your opinion, and those who agree with you. It is not law. Works both ways, no?
168 posted on
10/29/2013 1:21:52 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson