To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Not according to Minor v. Happersett... Cruz is eligible because Obama was elected. Argument ends there. If I refute the fact that Obama was not elected then I can refute Cruz is ineligible. I can’t refute that Obama was elected.
The electorate has lowerd the Constitutional bar. Simple.
I think you've called it. From then on, it's the cult of personality.
Fascinating psychology and more than a bit creepy. Happy Halloween.
153 posted on
10/29/2013 12:46:41 PM PDT by
GBA
(Ezekiel ch. 7, verses 1-14...our consequences?)
To: GBA; CodeToad; wideawake; Cletus.D.Yokel
I think you've called it. From then on, it's the cult of personality.
Fascinating psychology and more than a bit creepy. Happy Halloween.
Both CodeToad and Wideawake have proven both of you wrong, and yet you persist.
I see you have started the same crap that various losers used to slime Sarah supporters as well.
If you can't win an argument, call people names.
157 posted on
10/29/2013 12:51:58 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson