Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tsowellfan; helpfulresearcher
If they rule against Ted Cruz being eligible it would be a win, win for the American people. Cruz would be able to remain in the US Senate where he can begin to dismantle any law that the disqualified pResident had signed during his whole illegitimate pResidency including ObamaCare.

Nope, that would be a win for the losers who brought the case only, probably a loser Democrat of some sort.

It would be a complete loss for the United States, and possibly signal an end to this Democratic Republic. The final nail in the coffin.

He is the only possible candidate fighting against Amnesty, the only possible candidate fighting against Obamacare.

Oh, it might, in your mind, prove you were right all along, but the real loser would be this experiment in Representative governance we call a constitutional government.
121 posted on 10/29/2013 11:57:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie
Oh, it might, in your mind, prove you were right all along, but the real loser would be this experiment in Representative governance we call a constitutional government.

No, you're missing the point all together. The issue is not whether or not I am right or wrong. The issue is that we are now living in a post constitutional America.

People cannot be picking and choosing which parts of the US Constitution is valid (based on their agenda)and which parts are not. When this happens the whole document is taken with a grain of salt.

320 posted on 10/29/2013 5:57:12 PM PDT by tsowellfan (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson