Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

People can criticize the pensioners, but they had a good-faith agreement with the city that those pensions would be honored, and 16-cents-on-the-dollar will likely put them on welfare at best and on the streets at worst. The city had an obligation to manage its revenues to support its obligations. Now, IF the pensions had a medical insurance component, THAT is the part that should be cut or rolled-back.


45 posted on 10/28/2013 11:01:47 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

The greedy unions and greedy politicians made deals promising each other Other Peoples Money. They failed in any fiduciary responsibility they had.

Let the public officials who made those promises pay up.


46 posted on 10/28/2013 11:03:39 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle
The city had an obligation to manage its revenues to support its obligations

Unfortunately government exempted itself from having to fully fund their pensions. These workers should have been able to contribute more to their pensions too.

49 posted on 10/28/2013 11:07:45 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson