Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

OK. I can answer only in this way. Romneycare is no more a form of socialism, than it is is a form of socialism that my state requires me to have automobile insurance. It is basically the same concept.


41 posted on 10/28/2013 10:25:34 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

Or “no less a form of socialism”? Enough arguments have been made that connect compulsory automobile insurance and socialism.


43 posted on 10/28/2013 10:28:10 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines; Uncle Miltie
OK. I can answer only in this way. Romneycare is no more a form of socialism, than it is is a form of socialism that my state requires me to have automobile insurance. It is basically the same concept.

Sorry, but as Uncle Miltie pointed out to you up-thread, there is a HUGE difference between something that is optional like Auto Insurance and something that deals with your very existence, your health.

You are parrotting the Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney's lies he used to support the steaming pile of Socialist crap called RomneyCare.

Requiring me to purchase Health Insurance, or even Auto Insurance is an unacceptable form of Statist Governance for any conservative.

Requiring me to Purchase Health Insurance at an increased cost(Under threat of fine, and possibly imprisonment) so that I can subsidize (Pay For) the Health Insurance of someone else, is nothing but unmitigated Socialism.

There should be no excuse, or support for, this type of Socialist garbage from any conservative.
46 posted on 10/28/2013 10:33:14 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

Apples and kumquats comparison...

Auto insurance is optional, based on whether or not you choose to operate a motor vehicle. There is no law MANDATING that you MUST operate a motor vehicle, thus requiring vehicle insurance.

Health insurance has been deemed compulsory, mandatory simply for existing in these United States of America.


48 posted on 10/28/2013 10:34:46 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

I don’t have auto insurance. I have no car.

Should I be shot by the fascist thugs because I am not paying in?

ObamaCare and RomneyCare are not about getting people insured, you might have noticed that premiums skyrocketed - this is because it is a wealth redistribution scheme and some people will be paying the premiums for others.

This is socialism. Even if it is done at a state level.


62 posted on 10/28/2013 10:55:08 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson